Traditionally, many of us who have been in the paranormal
investigation field for a while have always had to wait for nightfall to
come before we could expect to get any sort of decent paranormal photos.
I had surmised, as early as 2002, from research I had been working on
that the paranormal anomalies we had been photographing were on the IR
(infrared) portion of the Electromagnetic Spectrum. I knew this was the
key, but I had not found the lock that this figurative key would fit.
That would change in the summer of 2007. Five years after I began to
solidify my theories on the paranormal / IR connection I had the
fortuitous experience of meeting Scott Crownover and Patty Wilson, both
experienced and well known paranormal investigators in their own right.
As we talked shop about paranormal projects and experiments we had been
working on Scott explained that he had been working on a photography
technique that allowed paranormal investigators to take photos of
anomalies in the day time. For me that was no big thing, I had taken
1000’s of pics during both the day and evening hours and occasionally I
would get an anomaly here and there – no big revelation. This, however,
was not what Scott was referring to. He showed examples of his
technique: several photos of fully formed apparitions – taken in broad
daylight! This was not a fluke, it was not a fraud, it was the real
thing.
I asked
Scott how to get these types of photos and the answer was so simple you
may be as surprised as I was. Scott explained that all you have to do is
get an IR lens for your camera (the camera must have a threaded lens
adapter ring), a tripod and a camera with night shot – that’s it. Set up
the camera as you normally would to take photos, put the IR lens in
place, set the camera on nightshot mode, hook the camera up to the
tripod and start taking pictures*.
Naturally, I
was slightly skeptical that something so simple would work so well –
I had always believed that if something is too good to be true it
usually is, but excitement would override all cautionary skepticism –
and in this instance I do not regret that it did. I asked Scott what
brand of lenses that he used as well as the Nm (nanometer wavelength)
range, he gave me the specifics and from there I began shopping around.
There are many photography websites that offer numerous individual and
package deals on lenses that range from 630 Nm to 1000 Nm. I settled on
a set of four (4) lenses that were 780 Nm, 850 Nm, 930 Nm and 1000 Nm. I
figured that with a good range of IR lenses I would be able to work in
just about any circumstance.
Why is
there such as vast difference in the anomalies captured in IR
photographs vs. those captured in flash-assisted photos? How can such a
simple adjustment, a tweak of the light filtration change the outcome of
a photo so drastically? I’m not going to lie to you – at this time I am
not completely sure as to the mechanics of the process but I speculate
that a camera taking a photograph of an anomaly in a visible light
assisted
situation (such as with a flash) creates an effect akin to when you view
a mirage. The visible light source masks the form of the anomaly and
thusly the “signature,” the true identity of the anomaly, is camouflaged
by the photons of the IR light matrix being partially washed out by the
visible light intrusion from the flash, thusly only the densest core
particles of bioelectric energy from the anomaly are captured in the
photograph.
At this
point, rather than continuing with rambling on about how great this
technique works or expounding on how you can use it I will present some
basic information on the IR filters themselves and leave the rest to
you.
IR Lens Technical Specs:
• Manufacturer: Hoya Optics (many other manufacturers are available)
• Lens ring or filter adapter sizes commonly available are 25, 25.5, 30,
37, 58, 67, 72, 75, 77 and 82 mm
• Commonly available nm (nanometer) configurations are 630, 665, 715,
780, 830, 850, 1000 nm
* You must have the IR lens installed before you put the camera into
nightshot mode otherwise you risk serious damage to the CCD in your
camera. Individuals results will vary and neither Brian Schill, Scott
Crownover or any other affiliated party with the publication of this
article assumes any responsibility or liability for damages that may be
incurred stemming from the use of this photographic technique.